I have written a letter to PARWA EC, which is self-explanatory:
"I have received your above referred letter and confirm that I will attend the emergent meeting of PARWA EC scheduled for 17.09.2011 at 07.30 PM.
"I have received your above referred letter and confirm that I will attend the emergent meeting of PARWA EC scheduled for 17.09.2011 at 07.30 PM.
Yesterday I
saw a circular issued by you relating to the above meeting in which some
members of PARWA have been invited to attend the meeting. In this connection, I
will like to put following comments on record and for necessary action at your
end:
a)
My
letter dated 06.09.2011 was a notice served on President, Gen Secretary and all
office bearers of PARWA EC, and as such should be discussed by EC which has
taken wrong actions as detailed in my notice and other earlier letters.
b)
If
you have decided that these issues should be discussed in a body comprising of
EC members and other members of PARWA then there should be no discrimination in
selecting only few members to be invited to this meeting. All PARWA members should be invited. In other
words, an emergent GB meeting should be called.
c)
Effectiveness,
efficiency, neutrality and transparency of PARWA EC have been badly affected by
‘Group Culture’, where members of these groups work for their supremacy and not
for general welfare of PARWA. Above selection of few members out of larger PARWA
membership will only strengthen this group culture and harm the interests of
PARWA members
With only
few members being always in PARWA EC has created arrogance in them. Their mind
set has lost the capability to tolerate view points on various issues which are
in conflict with their own viewpoints. They do not hesitate in violating laws
to score a victory over those members whom they think are challenging their
authority. This does not augur well for PARWA, a welfare society bound by its
Bye-laws and law of the land.
My basic
purpose of raising various issues is to ensure that PARWA is not caught
violating the laws of the land and provisions of PARWA Bye-laws. Whenever I
raised these issues, I did not get any positive response from your side. I was
confronted with an arrogant attitude and a desire to belittle me and my views.
A misinformation campaign was launched by you to project me as a person who is
anti-welfare. Even my nomination for President PARWA was got illegally rejected
under a conspiracy between you and the Election Officer.
As part of the
misinformation campaign, Shriman Jai Vats, a member of PARWA EC, has circulated
a letter misinforming PARWA members. I was shocked to see this letter as in any
civil society no individual addresses such a letter to members of the society
by naming another individual and casting aspersions on him. If he had a
grievance with me he should have addressed a private communication to me. PARWA
EC certainly should not have behaved in this un-civil manner.
I am a member
of PARWA and my endeavour would always be to ensure that PARWA, as a welfare
society of residents of Pragati Apartments, religiously follows laws of the
land and PARWA Bye-laws. If PARWA has to raise funds for its
welfare/development schemes then such funds should be raised by legitimate
means and not by violating laws. I am sure that a larger section of PARWA
membership is opposed to any illegitimate means being adopted by PARWA EC and
will not like PARWA to be known as a
society which violates laws.
Please
include this letter, notice and other earlier letters as agenda reference
material for the meeting and circulate them to all PARWA members to enable them
to ponder on them and come to the meeting with a considered opinion to find out
positive solutions to these issues. Let us all make use of this opportunity to
create a synergic effect to raise PARWA to greater heights. Let us not be
guided by personal ego and vested personal and group interests.
The
proceedings of the meeting should be video/audio recorded. Views of each member
should be appropriately recorded against his/her name. Decision on each issue
should be put to vote and majority point of view should be recorded as the
decision of the meeting. The minutes of the meeting should be circulated to all
members.
Please
inform me of your decision of discussing these issues in an emergent EC meeting
as scheduled for 17.09.2011 with no discrimination in selecting invitees or in
an emergent GB meeting with all PARWA members."
