Truth behind Bhagidari Certificate

Chadha Malik & CO have been boasting about a certificate received under Bhagidari Scheme. On the basis of this piece of paper they have been claiming that PARWA is the best RWA in West Delhi. Performance of PARWA EC in Bhagidari has been highly disappointing. CLICK to read my earlier post on PARWA performance. Out of 8 projects under "My Delhi I care", PARWA EC could not get even a single project. A sum of Rs 5.5 lakhs was spent by Delhi Govt on these projects but PARWA EC could not a single paisa for welfare of its members.

What Chadha malik & Co could get is a piece of paper which they falsely claim is a certificate that PARWA is the best RWA in West Delhi. As they refused to give any information about their performance in Bhagidari, I filed an application with Delhi Govt under RTI Act. CLICK to read the questions asked in RTI.

I have now received the information. PARWA was given the certificate for:
a) Parks maintained by the RWA through own funds.
b) Constructed boundary wall and fencing by RWA.

So, this is the performance of Chadha Malik & Co for which they are praising themselves. They could not get even a single paisa from the Govt for development of the apartments and welfare of senior citizens. In fact they only spent residents' money on parks and fencing on boundary wall for which Govt has given them a certificate.

TEN RWAs have received cash awards ranging from Rs 25000 to Rs 1 lakh. Out of these one RWA is from B-5 Block, Paschim Vihar, which received Rs 1 lakh cash award. Shamelessly Chadha Malik & Co have claimed that PARWA is the best RWA in West Delhi.

SIXTEEN RWAs have received the certificate. PARWA is one of them. What is so great about it?

Chadha Malik & Co got themselved elected by adopting illegal, immoral and unethical means. They have also ashamedly took credit for this certificate. Their contribution as a good RWA (what to talk of best) is zero. I demand their resignation.

Any resident want to see the information provided by Delhi Govt may contact me at Flat No. 315, at mobile 9810073862.

ग्रुप सी फ्लेट्स, प्रगति अपार्टमेंट्स

प्रगति अपार्टमेंट्स में ३५६ फ्लेट्स हैं, जिन्हें ३ ग्रुप्स में बाँट दिया गया है, ग्रुप ए, बी और सी. ग्रुप सी में २३३ से ३५६ तक १३४ फ्लेट्स हैं. इन्हें २ ब्लाक्स में बांटा गया है, २३३ से ३०० (७८ फ्लेट्स) और ३०१ से ३५६ (५६ फ्लेट्स). इन दोनों ब्लाक्स से एक-एक प्रतिनिधि चुना जाता है.

अभी गैरकानूनी ढंग से जो चुनाव हुआ है उस में ग्रुप सी के दोनों ब्लाक्स से कोई प्रतिनिधि नहीं चुना गया. गैरकानूनी पार्वा कार्यकारणी ने पार्वा उपनियमों का उल्लंघन करके श्री टी डी सोनी (फ्लेट संख्या २५५) और कँवर जीत सिंह (फ्लेट संख्या ३०५) को इन ब्लाक्स का प्रतिनिधि मनोनीत कर दिया. पार्वा कार्यकारणी को ऐसा कोई अधिकार नहीं है, पर जिस कार्यकारिणी का चुनाव खुद गैरकानूनी हो, उसे गैरकानूनी काम करने में शर्म कैसी.

श्री सोनी, चुनाव अधिकारी थे. उन्होंने पार्वा उपनियमों का उल्लंघन करके श्री चड्ढा को पार्वा अध्यक्ष पद गिफ्ट किया. श्री चड्ढा ने श्री सोनी को ब्लाक प्रतिनिधि और संयुक्त सचिव का पद रिटर्न गिफ्ट में दे दिया. यह गैरकानूनी है, अनैतिक है, बेईमानी है, इस की किसे चिंता?

श्री कँवर जीत सिंह ने ब्लाक प्रतिनिधि पद के लिए नामांकन भरा था जिसे श्री सोनी ने चड्ढा मलिक एंड कम्पनी के कहने पर रद्द कर दिया. गैरकानूनी चुनाव संपन्न होने के बाद चड्ढा मलिक एंड कम्पनी ने श्री कँवर जीत सिंह को ब्लाक प्रतिनिधिमनोनीत कर दिया. परदे के पीछे ऐसा क्या हुआ होगा जिस से चुनाव से पहले ब्लाक प्रतिनिधि पद के लिए अयोग्य सिंह साहब चुनाव के बाद ब्लाक प्रतिनिधि पद के योग्य हो गए?

ग्रुप सी के गिने-चुने निवासियों को ही यह पता होगा कि यह दोनों महानुभाव उनके प्रतिनिधि हैं, इन्होनें तो ब्लाक निवासियों की कोई मीटिंग बुलाई नहीं, न ही उनसे कोई बात की. पार्वा कार्यकारिणी की कई मीटिंग्स हो चुकी हैं. इन दोनों प्रतिनिधियों ने ग्रुप सी की कोई समस्या इन मीटिंग्स में नहीं उठाई. बस कुछ किया तो चड्ढा मलिक एंड कम्पनी के समर्थन में हाथ ऊंचा किया.

कहते हैं, नंग बड़े परमेश्वर से, जब व्यक्ति शर्म छोड़ देता है तब भगवान् भी उस के सामने असहाय हो जाते हैं.

Who represents this block?

Any guess?
NO!!!
Look again at the photos with care.
Still NO !!!
OK, I will tell you. Name of the block representative is Shri Soni. Surprised? Yes, you should be. Shri Soni was Election Officer in recently concluded election of PARWA EC. After the elections were over , Chadha Malik & Co rwarded him for the favour he gave to them in getting elected unopposed. Yes, yes, it is immoral, unethical and illegal, but who bothers?
Now, the passage as shown in the photos is very frequently used by residents of C-block. Pipe is broken and water flows in the passage. Lot of kachra/malba is lying there for long. A scooter with deflated tyre is parked for long. It is highly inconvenient for residents using the passage.
Shri Soni is not alone who is not bothered about this. PARWA vice-president and treasurer also live in C-block. Day before I saw them chatting just near the malba.
They seem to have selective vision.

Taliban in Pragati Apartments

Today I saw a talibani fatwa issued by illegal President and Gen Sec of PARWA. If you have not seen it then click on the image.

Chadha Malik & Co are becoming bolder by each day. Today they have said that they will deflate the tyres of the cars. Tomorrow they will issue a fatwa that cars will be impounded.

Such decisions should not be taken by EC especially an EC which has been elected illegally, which has block representatives and Joint Secretary illegally nominated in violation of PARWA Bye-Laws. In any case such threats should never be issued to members of RWA. Using a term 'defaulter' for hon'ble residents and members pf PARWA is crossing the limits of civilized behaviour.

An EGBM should have been called to decide such issues. Even GB should shy away from taking such decisions.

Coming back to the issue of deflating car tyres, who will do it, illegal president or illegal Gen Sec or some other illegal member of illegal EC, or security guards will be asked to do this crminal act? Anybody touching a car with ulterior motive will be indulging in a criminal act. He will be accountable to the harm done to car. In the guise of deflating tyres he may steal some components of the car. In any case he will cause huge inconvenience to car owner. A criminal complaint most likely will be filed with the police against the person touching the car. I advise members of the illegal EC not to indulge in any criminal activity which may create a law and order problem in the apartments. If any such problem arises then they will be solely responsible.

This offending circular should be withdrawn and illegal EC should submit an apology for giving threats to residents and hurting their feelings. If it is not done by Monday evening then I will consider filing a police complaint against them for issuing threats to damage the cars and for creating law and order situation in the apartments.

Recreation Centre for Senior Citizens

Department of Social Welfare, Govt of NCT of Delhi, is operating a scheme for financing setting up of recreation centres exclusively for senior citizens. It is a good opportunity for PARWA to explore possiblity of having a recreation centre in Pragati Apartmentsast. I have seen one such centre in Lajpat Nagar, in a park near Amar Colony Market.

Chadha Malik & Co. should immediately get on the job as last date for filing application is 16.08.2011.

महंगी विजली और डीईआरसी की जन सुनवाई

कहाँ है चड्ढा मलिक & कम्पनी?
दो दिन हो गए डीईआरसी की जन सुनवाई होते हुए. लगभग १०० आरडब्लूए और ग्राहक एक्टिविस्टों ने अपना पक्ष रखा, विजली को महंगा किये जाने के खिलाफ. पार्वा ने इस सुनवाई में भाग नहीं लिया. क्यों?

क्या चड्ढा मलिक & कम्पनी में यह योग्यता ही नहीं है कि वह इस सुनवाई में भाग ले पाते? क्या यह सब कुछ उनकी समझ से परे है? क्या वह बस इतने ही काबिल हैं कि षड्यंत्र करके और कानूनों की धज्जियाँ उड़ा कर नेता बने रहें और अपार्टमेन्ट निवासियों के पैसे से पेट-पूजा करते रहें?

मैंने इस ब्लाग पर दो पोस्ट डालीं.
विजली महंगी होने के खिलाफ एक हो कर लडें

पार्वा ईसी अपना कर्तव्य पूरा करे
अब तक सुनवाई में क्या हुआ यह जानने के लिए साथ की इमेज पर क्लिक करें. ग्रेटर कैलाश - १ की आरडब्लूए के श्री राजीव ककरिया ने सुनवाई में अपना पक्ष रखा. क्यों पार्वा को ऐसे नेता नहीं मिल सकते? क्यों पार्वा के लिए चड्ढा और मलिक जैसे बेकार नेता ही मिलते हैं?

अभी भी समय है, गैर-कानूनी तरीकों से कुर्सी पर जमें इन घटिया नेताओं को उतार फेंको. इन की जगह राजीव ककरिया जैसे नेताओं को चुनो.

Code of Ethics for EC members

I propose a Code of Ehics for PARWA EC members:

DO's

a) Every EC member shall work for the welfare of the residents of Pragati Apartments.
b) Every EC member shall work with honesty, integrity, sincerity, team spirit and complete devotion to fulfil the aspirations of residents of Pragati Apartments.
c) Every EC member shll ensure that residents money is spent with care and not wasted in unproductive expenditure, such as conveyence and refreshments.
d) Every EC member shall ensure transparency in day-to-day working.
e) Every EC member shall ensure that inquiries/suggestions/complaints received from members are promptly replied and acted upon.
f) Every EC member shall ensure that every single decision is appropriately recorded and information disseminated to members.
g) Every EC member shall ensure that roles and responsibilities of each EC member are displayed in office and disseminated to members.
h) Every EC member shall display in the office the timings when he will be available in the office so that members can visit the office and meet him for any work.

DONT's

a) No EC member shall indulge in any illegal, immoral and unethical activity.
b) No EC member shall take any action which is in violation of PARWA Bye-laws.
c) No EC member shall promote the interests of individual members and groups and their decisions shall not be influenced by personal vested interests of any individual or group.
d) No EC member shall use PARWA employees, security guards, malis, sweepers, for their personal work.
e) No EC member shall take illegal favours from the vendors by taking their products and srvices free of charge, such as, plumber, electrician, cable guy, internet service provider, vegetable/fruit sellers etc.
f) No EC member shall take commission in cash or kind while granting permission to advertisers and outside agencies who want to display/sell their product/services in the apartments.
g) No EC member shall take commission in cash or kind for granting contract to service providers for holding PARWA functions in the apartments.
h) No EC member will be party to theft of electricity during PARWA functions, such as, Diwali Mela.
i) No EC member shall use PARWA office for doing any work other than official work and attending EC meetings.

These are some Do's and Dont's which I could think of prsently. Any sugestions are welcome.

Illegal RWA EC Election 2011 - two more illegalities

Some time back I have uploaded a post - Illegal PARWA EC Election 2011 - in which I pointed out many illegalities committed in the election. Two more illegalities have come to my notice. These illegalities relate to Composition of EC, Bye-law 8.2.

a) Post of Joint Secretary - As per the bye-law the post of Joint Secreatry will be filled from the six elected EC members. Today I was surprised to learn that Shri T D Soni of Flat 255 has been nominated as Joint secretary. As per the result declared by EO no body has been elected from the block of flats 233 - 300. How can then Shri Soni can be made Joint Secreatry? He has not been elected as EC member. His nomination as Joint Secretary is illegal and in violation of PARWA Bye-laws.

In addition, Shri Soni was part of the team which conducted the election. He has even been designated (though illegally) as Election Officer by Shri Aggarwal who illegally designated himself as Chief Election Officer. It has been alleged that there was a conspiracy between outgoing President and Gen Secretary and the Election Officer and his team. Is this nomination of Shri Soni is a reward to him given by Chadha Malik & Co for his role ensuring that Chadha and Malik are re-elected? This is immoral and unethical. No body has heard that a member of election commission is nominated to the house after elections are over. This proves the allegation.

b) EC member fron block of flats 301 - 356 - This is second surprise. Shri Kanwar Jit Singh of Flat 305 has been nominated as EC member. As per the result declared by EO no body has been elected from the block of flats 301 - 356. there is no provision in Bye-laws for EC to nominate block representatives. These positions can only be filled through election. Nomination of Shri Kanwar Jit Singh as EC momber is illegal and in violation of Bye-laws.

In addition, Shri Kanwar jit Singh has filed his nomination as block representative. His nomination was rejected by the EO without assigning any reason in writing. But after the election same Shri Kanwar Jit Singh was nominated as EC member. How a person whose nomination was rejected became eligible for the same post after election? This is unheard of. This is illegal and in violation of Bye-laws.

This EC election is really a blot on the fair name of PARWA. If Chadha Malik & Co have any shame left they should immediately resign. An emergency meeting of GB should be called to dissolve this illegally elected EC and fresh elections should be ordered.

Though illegal, PARWA EC should get ready for monsoon

I hope you have seen the public notice issued by MCD about the complaint redressal system to deal with the problems in monsoon season. If not then click on the image.

Has PARWA EC prepared itself for coming monsoon and how to address the problems of water logging, fallen trees, manhole covers, sanitation, repair of potholes or any other problem? I am sure they have not even thought of it. PARWA EC should immediately hold an emergency meeting and discuss this issue.

Block representatives should be specifically asked to keep an eye on monsoon related problems in their respective blocks. A coordinator should be appointed to coordinate with civic agencies. Whenever a complaint is received from a resident or a block representative, he should immediately report to concerned civil agency at the phone number given in the public notice. A complaint number will be given to him by the agency, and he should closely monitor the actions being taken by the civic agency to effectively solve the problem.

Residents should be informed about name and phone number of the coordinator.

Though illegal, PARWA EC should do its duty

Sometime back I wrote a post about massive power tariff hike. CLICK to read it if you have not read it so far.

Has Chadha Malik & Co. filed objections/comments on the proposals of DISCOMS asking for massive hike in power tariff not only for 2011-2012 but also for recovery of dues from consumers for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 after increasing the tariff for these two previous years? I am sure they have not done so. The massive power hike is going to hit hard. They have failed to do their duty.

Now DERC has given them another chance. The last date for submitting objection/comments has been extended up to 01.07.2011. Now they should immediately file objections/comments and attend the hearings as per programme (see the image) to present views of the residents of Pragati Apartments.

I know that the new EC has been elected illegally but they are occupying the PARWA Office and so have a duty towards the residents of Pragati Apartments.

घरेलू कामवालियों के लिए खुश खबरी

केंद्र सरकार ने राष्ट्रीय स्वास्थ्य बीमा योजना के अंतर्गत एक फैसला किया है जिस के अन्दर घरों में काम करने वाली बाइयों का ३०००० रूपए का वार्षिक बीमा कराया जायेगा. इस बीमे के लिए वार्षिक प्रीमियम ७५० रूपए होगा और यह प्रीमियम केंद्र सरकार देगी. इस योजना में हर बाई को पंजीकरण करना होगा. इसके लिए उन्हें २ प्रमाणपत्रों की जरूरत होगी. यह प्रमाणपत्र घर के मालिक, रेजिडेंट्स वेलफेयर असोसिएशन, बाईयों की यूनियन या पुलिस द्वारा दिया जा सकता है. पूरे विवरण के लिए साथ की इमेज पर क्लिक करें.

पार्वा द्वारा इस पर आवश्यक कार्यवाही शुरू कर दी जानी चाहिए जिस से प्रगति अपार्टमेंट्स में काम करने वाली बाईयों को इस बीमा योजना का फायदा मिल सके.

Unite and fight against massive power tariff hike

I am sure residents of Pragati Apartments are aware that the threat of a massive power tariff hike is looming large. Stakeholders and various consumer activists have been preparing to fight it out in the public hearing scheduled to be held in this month. I am not sure whether PARWA has submitted any objections to DERC.

The massive power hike is going to affect every one of us. The private Discoms are asking for significant hike in tariff for 2011-12 with BSES Yamuna is asking for a 85 % hike, BSES Rajdhani a 67 % hike, and NDPL a 50% hike.

Illegal PARWA EC will not do anything. The residents will have to act independent of PARWA EC. A group should be formed and a plan should be prepared to fight out this unjust hike.

Illegal PARWA Election 2011

I have been discussing with legal experts the illegalities committed by the Election Officer (EO) and outgoing President and General Secreatry, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik in PARWA Election 2011. There are many ileegalities:
a) Elections were held under modified bye-laws which were not approved by the competent authority under the Act.
b) Many provisions of the bye-laws were violated.
c) as per his own admission, EO has not read the bye-laws. How could he conduct the election when he was not aware of the election law?
d) EO conspired with outgoing President and General Secreatry, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik in rejecting nominations of some contestents.
e) As outgoing President and General Secreatry, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik were themselves contesting the election, there was clear conflict of interest. As EO was unaware of bye-laws, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik became the de-facto Election Officer.
f) The list of members, eligible to contest and vote in the election, was not displayed by outgoing President and General Secreatry, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik.
g) List of residents who filed their nomination was not displayed by EO.
h) List of residents whose nomination was rejected by EO was not displayed by EO.
i) Objections filed by a contestent were not appropriately addressed by EO and were rejected without applying his mind and against the principles of natural justice.
f) Objections filed by a contestent were not appropriately addressed by outgoing EC and were rejected without applying i mintsd and against the principles of natural justice.
g) Residents, whose nominations were rejected by EO, were not informed of rejection and reasons thereof, not giving them any chance to contest the grounds of rejection. This is against the principles of natural justice.
h) EO was found by residents having meeting and partying with outgoing President and General Secreatry, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik during time slot fixed for filing nominations. This is against the principles of natural justic and also shows that EO was in conpiracy with them.

There may be many other violations which I am studying. Legal experts have advised some actions which also I am studying and will take as advised.

This illegal election is a blot on the fair name of PARWA and Pragati Apartments. It is the duty of every resident to protest these illegalities and get this illegal election set aside.

Bhagidari - RTI about PARWA EC performance

CLICK to read my earlier post on the performance of PARWA EC in Bhagidari initiative. PARWA EC could not get even a single project under this scheme. What they got is a piece of paper which they falsely claim is a certificate that PARWA is the best RWA in West Delhi.

As illegally forced in PARWA EC, Mr Chadha and Mr Malik have refused to give any information about their performance in Bhagidari, I intend to file an application with Delhi Govt under RTI Act. The quaestion are as follows:

"Smt Sheila Dikshit, Chief Minister of Delhi has awarded a Certificate of Recognition to Pragati Apartments Residents Welfare Association (PARWA), Paschim Vihar for appreciable contribution to Bhagidari initiative in 2010. Relating to this, please provide following information under RTI Act, 2005:

a) Give details of all the awards given to RWAs under Bhagidari initiative.

b) Is cash also given to RWAs along with some awards? Give details of such awards and amount of cash award.

c) Provide a list of RWAs who have been given awards in 2010 along with details of contribution made by these RWAs to Bhagidari initiative including by PARWA.

d) What are the criteria for selection of RWAs for giving awards? Give full details.

e) What is the procedure followed for selecting RWAs for these awards? Give full details.

f) Is there a committee which selects the RWAs for giving awards? Give details of such committee and its members.

g) Do the members of above committee visit the colony of RWAs and what aspects of RWAs functioning are checked/verified?

h) On what dates the committee visited Pragati Apartments and what were its findings. Give all details.

i) Who represented PARWA during the visits of committee members to Pragati Apartments and during other interactions?

j) Can a RWA after getting the Certificate of Recognition claim that it the best RWA in the area?

k) Is it checked and verified that RWA follows the laws of the land, such as, paying minimum wages and overtime at prescribed rates to its employees? Was it checked in case of PARWA?"

Who represents PARWA in RWC?

CLICK to read my earlier post on this subject.

As new PARWA EC is illegal, its occupation of the office of PARWA is illegal. I am taking appropriate steps to get this election declared null & void. Till such time members of PARWA will have to deal with this illegal EC.

MCD has constituted RWCs to give more and better say to RWAs in the development of their residential complexes and surrounding areas. For this purpose PARWA was to nominate a resident to this area's RWC. This illegal EC has not informed PARWA members about this.

As a member of PARWA I demand to know:
a) Name of the resident who has been nominated to RWC.
b) How the name of this PARWA representative was decided?
c) Has any meeting of RWC has been held so far?
d) What issues were projected in RWC by PARWA representative?
e) Why PARWA members have not been informed about this?

Mr Chadha and Mr Malik, the illegal occupiers of the positions of President and Gen Secretary, have been behaving in an arrogant manner. Working of PARWA EC is not transparent. If they have any self-respect then they should immediately step down and let fresh elections be called by PARWA GB.

प्रगति अपार्टमेंट्स की श्रीमती शशि बाला सर्वश्रेष्ठ महिला नंबर दो चुनी गईं

वरिष्ट नागरिक केसरी क्लब की पंजाबी बाग़ शाखा ने पिछले दिनों अपनी पांचवीं वर्षगाँठ बहुत धूमधाम से मनाई. इस समारोह में काफी बड़ी संख्या में वरिष्ट नागरिकों ने भाग लिया. रंगारंग कार्यक्रम हुआ, सबने एक दुसरे के साथ खुशियाँ बांटीं. झूमते, नाचते-गाते वरिष्ट नागरिकों ने साबित कर दिया कि हम भी किसी से कम नहीं हैं.

अनेक वरिष्ट नागरिकों को सम्मानित किया गया. सर्वश्रेष्ठ दंपत्ति, सर्वश्रेष्ठ पुरुष, सर्वश्रेष्ठ महिला, 'हमारे हीरो' एवं 'अति-आकर्षक दंपत्ति' के विशेष पुरूस्कार दिए गए. श्रीमती कृष्णा को सर्वश्रेष्ठ महिला के प्रथम पुरुस्कार से सम्मानित किया गया. प्रगति अपार्टमेन्ट की श्रीमती शशि बाला को सर्वश्रेष्ठ महिला के द्वितीय पुरूस्कार से सम्मानित किया गया. श्रीमती शशि बाला फ्लेट नंबर १७५ की निवासी हैं. उन्हें और उनके पति श्री गोपाल सरन शर्मा को किसी परिचय की आवश्यकता नहीं है.

हमारी तरफ से श्रीमती शशि बाला को बहुत-बहुत वधाई और उन्हें एवं उनके पति को सुखद जीवन की शुभकामनाएं.

Paying subscription fee to PARWA is mandatory

A Delhi Trial Court has ruled that owners or occupents of a flat are bound to pay theembership fee to RWA of the colony to fund its various welfare activities and services. For details, click on image.

PARWA should bring this court order to the notice of those residents who have not paid the subscription.

Why I did not speak in last AGBM?

A member has commented in C-box:
"member: SC Gupta never opens his mouth in GB or anywhere, he only writes untrue thing in web and hide."

I would say both Yes and No.

In last few meetings of GB, I have spoken but it was of no use. There was no discipline. There used be no respect for chair. People used to shout at each other, even coming to exchanging blows with each other. These were only group fights, trying to score over other group. No proper discussion, no proper announcement of decisions on issues, no proper recording of decision in the minutes.

I wanted to speak in last AGBM. There was an important issue of illegal EC elections. I had given a representation to Mr Chadha, asking EC to hold its emergency meeting and invite me to present my views in person on the illegality in election process. I had also asked EC to discuss its decision in AGBM. Mr Chadha did not reply to my representation, neither it was discussed by EC, nor was I invited to EC meeting. He also did not put up my representation before GB.

I could have raised this issue in AGBM but was discouraged by many factors. Only 14% of members were present. The strong presence of ladies baffled me. I was given a hint by some residents that I will not be allowed to speak, that I will be shouted down. I never believed that Mr Chadha will go to such extent to defend his illegal actions. I did not want a situation in AGBM which will further erode the good name of PARWA.

I am all for discussion but a sincere and to-the-point discussion. I am ready for any debate at any time with Mr Chadha and/or any other member(s) of this illegal PARWA EC. Let them come forward and have an open debate in Central Park.

Now coming to writing untrue things and hide - I have never written anything untrue. What I have written in available on the blog. Let anybody answer that and prove that it is untrue. And who is hiding? This member has not commented under his real name. This is my blog and everybody knows it. I am not hiding from anybody.

Illegal PARWA EC is against children

Have you seen the minutes of AGBM held on May 1, 2011? The great Mr Malik had recorded the following as a decision taken in this meeting:
"5. Children should not be allowed to play in the park."

First it is a wrong recording. No such decision was taken. The issue was no doubt raised and some discussion took place, but it was inconclusive. A member even said that Delhi High Court has given a decision that children will play in the parks. How PARWA GM can decide against the decision of Delhi High Court.? I am not a legal person but will it not be treated as a Contempt of Court?

I want to ask PARWA one question. Where children will play if they are not allowed to play in the parks? Has PARWA made some alternative arrangement for this? The oldies in PARWA are much beyond the age of playing, but for children playing is very important. How can they be stopped from playng in the parks, and that too after the High Court decision?

Only 14% members attended the AGBM and only a few of them might be against children playing in parks. How can "Children should not be allowed to play in the park" be recorded as a majority decision of PARWA? This is wrong. The minutes should be amended and re-circulated. Mr Malik and Mr Chadha can not wrongly draft the decisions of PARWA.

Moreover this PARWA EC has been declared elected by Election Officer in an illegal manner. Its members have no moral, legal and ethical right to work as EC members . Both Chadha and Malik are vulnerable to a conflict of interest in dealing with election issues as they themselves were contesting the election of President and General Secretary. Misusing their position they did not display the list of those members who were eleigble and not-eleigible for contesting and voting in the election. By hiding this information, they illegally ensured their election to new EC by advising election officer to reject some nominations including that of Mr Gupta for the post of President. Election officer had informed that he did not read the Bye-Laws and was found having a meeting with both Mr Chadha and Mr Malik.

This illegal election is a blot on the fair name of PARWA. To restore PARWA's fair name this election should be cancelled and fresh election should be ordered.

Bhagidari - Projects Under "My Delhi I Care"

I was reading about Bhagidari scheme of Dekhi Govt relating to West Delhi. I found a list of completed projects under "My Delhi I care". CLICK to Read.

You will notice that out of 8 projects 5 belong to Rama Park (C-Block) RWA. These are:

1. Provision of Iron Gate and sinage indicating name of colony/Association at entrance, C-Block Rama Park
2. Provision for recreation centre for Senior Citizen
3. Provision for main hole cover
4. Provision for Iron Gate adn sign ages
5. Provision for construction of entry gate at three locations and sign board

The total cost is about 5.5 lakhs.

What is the performance of PARWA EC in this respect - a certificate printed on a piece of paper?