Stop compromising security of Pragati Apartments

For last few days I have been watching the development in PARWA EC. Bickerings in PARWA EC are ON again. Security has always been a bane of contention in Pragati Apartments. Vice-president is in-charge of security. During my brief association with PARWA EC, I have seen that President and Secretary always act as super-in-charge of every thing in PARWA including security. They, as a routine, interfere in the job of security in-charge. This creates disaffection between PARWA officer bearers and also between security guards. I have seen it happening in last PARWA EC. From what I have heard and seen, it is happening in current PARWA EC also. The difference is taht the bickerings have overshoot this time. An unpleasant situation has been created where President himself became security in-charge.

Services of two guards were terminated. This is when PARWA is always short of security guards. One security guard was handed over to police on a petty matter of a missing phone instrment. The circumstances under which the phone instrument went missing and later found abandoned in a park speak volumes of the bad blood flowing between officer bearers of PARWA. This is compromising the security of the apartments. Any time any unpleasant incident cam happen.

I demand that President, Vice-president and Secretary should explain this to PARWA members, and assure that such bickerings will stop forthwith and affairs of PARWA will be run in an atmosphere of trust and respect for each other. All groups and counter-groups should be demolished and PARWA EC should act as one unit.

Does President PARWA own Pragati Apartments?

Today I had a heated discussion. It was 1:5. I,one on one side and they were five on the pther side. I shouted at them and they shouted at me. Some serious issues emerged out of the heated discussion.

A resident said that President PARWA is owner of the Pragati Apartments (प्रधानजी मालिक हैं प्रगति अपार्टमेन्ट के). I said no, he is a representative of the residents. The resident further said that President is the Sarkar of Pragati Apartments (प्रधानजी सरकार हैं प्रगति अपार्टमेन्ट की). I again said no, he is the representative of the residents.

Another point came out - security gaurds are owned by Vice-president (सुरक्षा कर्मचारी उपप्रधान के आदमी हैं). I said no, they are the employees of PARWA.

This is a dangerous mind set. If representatives start thinking that they are the owners or sarkar of the apartments then it is not a good sign for PARWA.

Let us discuss it. President, Vice-president and Secretary should come out what they think about it. Do they consider themselves as representatives of the residents or owners of the apartments?